Dyno day... - Mustang Forum

MonteCitan · 10-12-2014, 08:21 PM

What it has:

Gt40 tubular intake, e303, SVO headers and catback... C&L 73mm maf and an an aftermarket fpr that doesn't have a vacuum port.. Car is running 10.6 apr at 3500 rpm, way too rich..

That said I want to add an sc to the car but need to address the rich condition first..looking to get into it next weekend. - Any thoughts from someone who may have been thr

MonteCitan · 10-12-2014, 08:27 PM

bs that I can't edit a message I intended to finish.... But it is MW.. we are 5 years behind the modern world... meant to ask if anyone's been in the 'car runs rich' category and how did you fix it?

modo · 10-13-2014, 12:06 PM

fpr needs to have a vacuum reference as thats the whole point to keep fp consistent when the intake manifold is under vacuum or at wot ( no vacuum).

i have seen where the screw adjustment is also the vacuum port. that said is it that fat at wot? tuned or just the c&l?

id lose the c&l for a pro-m and get the fpr vacuum referenced to start.

MonteCitan · 10-13-2014, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by modo

fpr needs to have a vacuum reference as thats the whole point to keep fp consistent when the intake manifold is under vacuum or at wot ( no vacuum).

i have seen where the screw adjustment is also the vacuum port. that said is it that fat at wot? tuned or just the c&l?

id lose the c&l for a pro-m and get the fpr vacuum referenced to start.

I have to check for a chip, to my knowledge it's just the C&L

And it's rich all the time, but was richest 3500-4k RPM at WOT (10.6:1 at worst) FPR is set to 40, and that's what it should get up to with a regular FPR as manifold pressure drops...

I think I'll throw the factory MAF housing back on and see if it runs more normally, if it does I'll ditch the C&L.. Do you have any experience with the Moates quarterhorse? I've done similar binary tuning when I had the Buick so kind of interested in it...

n20capri · 10-14-2014, 06:01 AM

The Moates is supposed to be awesome. But yea all binary editing. It's definitely gotten better/easier over the years but as far as piggyback setups go it's supposed to be the best. I have the PiMP megasquirt setup and it's awesome. Full standalone though...

modo · 10-14-2014, 09:22 AM

no personal experience with QH but for the money it looks appealing. i actually just put a mass air meter back on my car and pro-m's computer. haven't fired it up yet

MonteCitan · 11-21-2014, 03:10 PM

FYI temporary countermeasures : clean MAF and clock to 3:00 position, runs smoother and no longer burns your eyes at idle

10-12-2014, 08:21 PM	#1
MonteCitan Partying like it's 19-99 Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: L.A. Posts: 6,500	Dyno day... What it has: Gt40 tubular intake, e303, SVO headers and catback... C&L 73mm maf and an an aftermarket fpr that doesn't have a vacuum port.. Car is running 10.6 apr at 3500 rpm, way too rich.. That said I want to add an sc to the car but need to address the rich condition first..looking to get into it next weekend. - Any thoughts from someone who may have been thr __________________ My car is slower than your car.

10-12-2014, 08:27 PM	#2
MonteCitan Partying like it's 19-99 Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: L.A. Posts: 6,500	bs that I can't edit a message I intended to finish.... But it is MW.. we are 5 years behind the modern world... meant to ask if anyone's been in the 'car runs rich' category and how did you fix it? __________________ My car is slower than your car.

10-13-2014, 12:06 PM	#3
modo That Guy Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: In a house Posts: 10,248	fpr needs to have a vacuum reference as thats the whole point to keep fp consistent when the intake manifold is under vacuum or at wot ( no vacuum). i have seen where the screw adjustment is also the vacuum port. that said is it that fat at wot? tuned or just the c&l? id lose the c&l for a pro-m and get the fpr vacuum referenced to start. __________________ 93 GT 66 Coupe

10-14-2014, 06:01 AM	#5
n20capri AscMcLaren Capri #26/115 Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Bensalem, PA Posts: 4,059	The Moates is supposed to be awesome. But yea all binary editing. It's definitely gotten better/easier over the years but as far as piggyback setups go it's supposed to be the best. I have the PiMP megasquirt setup and it's awesome. Full standalone though... __________________ Mike 86 AscMcLaren Capri #026/114 \| 11.2@123 86 Mustang SVO \|14.0@97 \| 19psi My Website 79-86 Dash Pad Repair Tech S-Box Install Tech Custom center caps, vinyl decals racing #'s etc www.baldguydesigns.net Want your car on a T-shirt? - CLICKY CLICKY

10-14-2014, 09:22 AM	#6
modo That Guy Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: In a house Posts: 10,248	no personal experience with QH but for the money it looks appealing. i actually just put a mass air meter back on my car and pro-m's computer. haven't fired it up yet __________________ 93 GT 66 Coupe

11-21-2014, 03:10 PM	#7
MonteCitan Partying like it's 19-99 Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: L.A. Posts: 6,500	FYI temporary countermeasures : clean MAF and clock to 3:00 position, runs smoother and no longer burns your eyes at idle __________________ My car is slower than your car.